<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ml haynes designtypography&#187;ml haynes design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mlhaynesdesign.com/category/typography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mlhaynesdesign.com</link>
	<description>creative services for pixels + print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>when good type goes bad</title>
		<link>http://mlhaynesdesign.com/when-good-type-goes-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://mlhaynesdesign.com/when-good-type-goes-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ML Haynes Design</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlhaynesdesign.com/2009/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, I&#8217;d seen the rumblings &#8217;round the blogs and design sites. Read the rants of typophiles and fans of all things Swiss Modern. But this morning the discourse was taken to another elevation when I read this. You know you&#8217;ve tapped into something when the New York Times weighs in. Either that or it&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mlhaynesdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ikea_verdana_03.jpg" alt="Ikea [hearts] Verdana" title="Ikea [hearts] Verdana" width="480" height="240" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-328" /></p>
<p>Sure, I&#8217;d seen the rumblings &#8217;round the blogs and design sites. Read the rants of typophiles and fans of all things Swiss Modern. But this morning the discourse was taken to another elevation when I read <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/05/arts/design/05ikea.html?_r=1&#038;ref=todayspaper">this</a>.</p>
<p>You know you&#8217;ve tapped into something when the New York Times weighs in. Either that or it&#8217;s a very slow news day at The Arts desk.</p>
<p>Go ahead. Google &#8220;Ikea&#8221; and &#8220;Verdana.&#8221; Then prepare to search through more than one million results, with everything from Flickr pages photodocumenting the grave deed to an <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/IKEAVERD/petition.html">&#8220;anti-Verdana&#8221; petition</a>. Ironically, the latter came up on my screen in, wait for it&#8230; Verdana.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb and disagree with Marius, this particular petition&#8217;s author, and a league of fellow designers here. As a hybrid creative — comfortably positioned in both print and pixels — I&#8217;m challenged by designers and art directors who are so enamored of a typeface (and Futura plays a part quite often, coincidentally) that they refuse to see the limitations or liabilities within their design choices. I also understand what may well be the business driver behind the Ikea decision as well as others we see coming, seemingly, from boardrooms instead of studios.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest: Futura is a poor type choice for online. The modern curves and equally weighted lines that make this a classic face are nearly impossible to render on-screen. Readability is sacrificed and, counter to a designers intent, so is the very quality of the face. Just doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>And as far as making a sound business decision, I&#8217;m of the mind that Ikea&#8217;s simply preparing a phase-out of their print catalog and migrating this sales material to its web-based sibling. The move might have been clumsy — pairing their logotype with the new-faced &#8220;2010&#8243; on the catalog cover made me shake my designer head — but it was not the end of the world as so many have suggested. I wonder if those same designers would be in such an uproar about brand consistency across platforms if the company had made another decision altogether.</p>
<p>At the end of the day most consumers, and Ikea brand enthusiasts, won&#8217;t notice the change. Before the hub-bub would any of us really noticed?</p>
<p>[added 19 SEP 09]</p>
<p>This landed in my inbox today — <a href="http://giraffeforum.com/wordpress/2009/09/19/ikea-chooses-an-ugly-font/">Ikea chooses an ugly font</a> — from <a href="http://www.gerrymcgovern.com">Gerry McGovern</a>. I&#8217;ve received his newsletter, New Thinking, for years and find that he&#8217;s always got something insightful and useful to share. This piece was particularly fitting and his perspective on the &#8220;why&#8221; of Ikea&#8217;s decision is spot-on, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mlhaynesdesign.com/when-good-type-goes-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

